No lie, in my first four days on this board I went from having just learned how really move edge to edge on tame slopes, to laying down long precise carves down steeps that I wouldn't have dreamed of attempting before. The truly amazing thing is the edge grip and hold, which, as another review described: "Defies physics." It really does. All the washing out on my soft, rocker rentals had left me pretty scared of hard snow. The way this board keeps you on edge even though the feel like you should definitely be on your ass. I feel like the standard width could be another (at least) 2mm wider in the waist. For my 165, 268 is not that wide, and even with my size 12 shrink tech boots, I have enough toe overhang with binding angles that I wouldn't be confident to try extreme carves. I'm guessing the narrowness has something to do with the fact that the board holds its edge so well, so maybe it really couldn't be wider. I just can't imagine someone with size 14+ feet being able to do much in way of turning on this board, (unless they're on the 170) and all the sizes are marketed for "big guys"...... In general I think it wouldn't hurt Lib Tech to add a tiny bit more width to their 160+ length boards. Yes, they have some UW sizes, but it would be great to have something still within the range of normal wide like 270/272